The mission of NOAP is to promote public safety through participation of potentially impaired healthcare professionals in monitored rehabilitation and recovery as an alternative to license discipline, emphasizing fitness to practice and retention of competent professionals. NOAP is committed to working in cooperation with regulatory and professional organizations toward this objective.

news & Updates

  • 04 Jan 2018 10:36 AM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    The current bylaws can be found online at  And the proposed change is noted below. The proposed addition will be added as "C. Other Memberships" to section "Section 2. Membership; Eligibility Requirements; Privileges:"

    C. Other Memberships
      1. The board of directors will determine the inclusion of any additional categories of membership as determined necessary

    Members may login and post comments regarding the proposed addition by replying to this message.
  • 04 Jan 2018 10:27 AM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    NOAP is seeking nominations to fill the following positions:

    • Treasurer (2 year term, expiring March 2020)*
    • Director-at-large (1) (2 year term, expiring March 2020)

    *The Executive Committee (President, President Elect, Treasurer, Secretary) are limited to members who are employed with an alternative to discipline or monitoring program. To encourage diversity among the board, the position of Director-at-large is open to any member of NOAP.

    The relevant bylaws are provided below for your information and review. Self nominations are encouraged. Please consider getting involved with your professional organization!

    Key Dates and Nomination Information:

    • Please submit your nominations to the NOAP Executive Office ( for the positions listed above.
    • Nominations are due by January 20, 2018.
    • Nominees must submit a 1 paragraph biography including qualifications and a statement of their interest in serving to the NOAP Executive Office on or before January 28, 2018. (Limit 200 words).
    • The ballot will be emailed to eligible voting members on February 24, 2018 and the nominees will take their positions at the conclusion of the 2018 Annual Conference.

    Thank you,

    Robert Ranieri
    Account Manager
    National Organization of Alternative Programs
    3416 Primm Lane
    Birmingham, AL 35216 USA
    P: 205-823-6106

    From the NOAP Bylaws

    ARTICLE V. Elections

    Section 1.

    1. All elections shall be conducted under the authority of the nominating committee.
    2. Elections shall be conducted every year, and ballots shall be sent to each eligible voting member 30 days prior to the annual meeting.
    3. In the event of a vacancy of President Elect, Secretary, or Treasurer, nominations and elections will be conducted for the remaining term of office.
    4. Organizational officers shall be duly elected by a majority of the ballots cast. President Elect shall be elected every two years for a four year term, serving as President Elect year one and two, and serving as President year three and four. All other Officers shall be elected for a two-year term. The President Elect, Secretary and one (1) Officer at large shall be elected on alternate years from the Treasurer and the other Officer at Large.

    ARTICLE VI. Officers

    Section 1. Terms of Office

    1. The Organization shall have six (6) elected officers: President, President Elect, Secretary, Treasurer and two (2) Officers-at-Large.
    2. Officers shall serve a two-year term of office, with a limit of two consecutive terms in any one office.
    3. The terms of office shall commence at the conclusion of the annual membership meeting and run through the conclusion of the annual membership meeting two (2) years hence. The outgoing President shall preside over the annual membership meeting.
    4. Absence from more than two consecutive meetings (Executive Committee and/or annual meeting) without cause shall constitute a resignation.
    5. In the event a vacancy occurs in the position of the President, the President Elect automatically assumes the presidency.
    6. In the event of an officer vacancy, the Executive Committee may appoint a duly qualified replacement if the remainder of the term of office is one year or less.

    Section 2. Functions

    1. President
      1. Officiates at Executive Committee and general Organization meetings.
      2. Maintains communication with committees of the organization.
      3. Serves on the Executive Committee for the two years following his/her term of office.
      4. Appoints members to committees as needed after consulting with the Executive Committee.
    2. President Elect
      1. Assumes the responsibilities at the request of, or in the absence of, the President during Executive Committee and Organization business meetings.
      2. Carries out those responsibilities delegated by the President or the Executive Committee.
      3. Provides oversight to the standing committees.
    3. Secretary
      1. Carries out those responsibilities delegated by the President or the Executive Committee.
      2. Records, maintains and distributes to the membership minutes of all organizational meetings.
      3. Maintains a current roster of the membership of the Organization, its committees and other essential documents.
    4. Treasurer
      1. Maintains the Organization’s financial accounts, non-profit status, and reports finances to the Executive Committee.
      2. Makes a report of the financial status of the Organization at all meetings and an annual report for distribution to the membership.
      3. Coordinates all financial responsibilities for the Organization including business meetings, special events and the routine expenses of the Organization.
      4. Carries out those responsibilities delegated by the President or the Executive Committee.
      5. Maintains an up-to-date list of the members whose dues are paid in full. Distributes notices to those members whose dues are in arrears.
      6. Prepares the records of the Organization for independent review and tax preparation.


  • 28 Jul 2016 12:22 PM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    These articles were originally published in "The Examiner" a Louisiana State Board of Nursing production. Volume 25, Number 3,

    Drug Testing 101 for Healthcare Employers
    by Barbara H. McGill, MSN, RN; Louisiana State Board of Nursing

    View the entire article (pdf).


      Healing the Healers: A conversation with Doctor C. on the brain disease of addiction
    Louis Catalide, MD; Diplomat American Board of Addictions Medicine

    View the entire article (pdf).


  • 27 Jun 2016 5:58 AM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    This link is the AANA’s directory for Peer Assistance and indicates whether the state has an alternative program.

  • 18 Nov 2015 11:24 AM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    Stop Calling It Behavioral Health!

    By Robert Kent JD and Charles Morgan MD 11/12/15

    Does the term cause stigma and discrimination?

    When somebody is treated for smoking cessation, the care will probably be provided within the behavioral health system. If that person is later diagnosed with lung cancer, that will be treated over in physical health. If she becomes depressed, that’ll be managed back over in behavioral health. But if the depression causes digestive problems, that aspect of the patient’s health and health care will be get the picture. Many “behavioral” issues are driven by biological or hereditary conditions, and yet physical and behavioral health are frequently organized, paid for and managed in two entirely different systems. Two key figures at OASAS, which oversees one of the largest addiction treatment systems in the country, argue that the divide between physical and behavioral health, and the term itself, can lead to stigmatization and discrimination against people with “behavioral disorders.” Robert Kent, J.D., the general counsel at the NYS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (OASAS), leads OASAS’s work to implement health care and insurance reform for the Substance Use Disorders system in New York. Charles Morgan, MD, is the medical director of OASAS and a physician who has devoted over three decades to working with people and families affected by addiction. They both want you to “STOP CALLING IT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH!”… Richard Juman, PsyD.

    We believe that it is time to stop calling substance use disorder and mental health “behavioral health.” We are unabashed advocates and supporters of the substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, prevention and recovery system. We are regularly amazed by the stories of people who are now able to live their lives in recovery because of the work done by the people in our system. We need to talk about these disorders in a language that reflects their true nature; they are medical conditions, the origins of which lie in the person’s brain, and the effects of which extend into every part of that person’s life, and as with other illnesses, virtually always into the lives of the people who are touched by the patient.

    The term “behavioral health” is imprecise, since it doesn’t indicate whether one is talking about a mental health condition or a substance use disorder. More importantly, the concept of “behavioral health” as separate from the rest of health care has allowed insurance and managed care companies to create rules for managing services which have denied people access to needed services. If you follow the logic of using the term “behavioral health,” then people with type 2 diabetes, heart disease and asthma could very accurately be identified as having a “behavioral health” issue, as their chronic medical condition is aggravated by their behaviors. But we would never do that with those disorders.

    Constellations of behavior manifest from many chronic medical conditions, some of which are construed as “medical” and others as “behavioral.” The bifurcation is as illogical as it is stigmatizing. People aren’t expected to be able to shrink their own tumors or cure their own infections, but they are expected to control their own behavior. Consequently, calling psychiatric and substance use conditions “behavioral” puts the onus on the patient, often to his tragic detriment in the form of discrimination in housing and employment or the realm of criminal prosecution.

    An individual with a substance use disorder has a natural, predictable disease course, one that is responsive to treatment, allowing for recovery. While we obviously do not want these symptoms to continue, blaming a person for their “behavioral health” issues, rather than treating them, is as counterproductive as blaming a person with epilepsy for falling down when they have a seizure, or blaming the person who is allergic to bees for disrupting the annual family reunion picnic because s/he needs emergency care when s/he is stung. Since we do not want such problems to continue or to be ignored, being judgmental or pejorative about them is harmful because it impedes treatment. In the case of the person with a bee allergy, we would instead encourage him to carry an EpiPen, and we would work to remove any barriers that might prevent him from doing so. We would also remove the bees’ nest!

    With regard to the methods and rules used by the insurers and managed care companies that operate in “behavioral health,” some of our recent initiatives provide ample proof of the impact of using the term. Thanks to the leadership of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, we now have a state law that requires insurance and managed care companies to have the decision-making criteria they use to manage substance use disorders reviewed and approved by OASAS. Our review of the criteria being used revealed that SUD level of care decisions were being significantly influenced by a person’s past failures or relapses, by whether they had “failed first” at a lower level of care before they sought a higher level of care, and by their “motivation” to seek help.

    Some insurers, and even some providers of care, use the term “motivation” to exclude people from treatment. This is in contrast to the concept of motivation as described by the stages of change model, or in motivational interviewing technique, where a patient’s level of motivation is understood in order to allow for effective treatment. These types of rules would never be allowed for other chronic medical conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and asthma. Would we deny a diabetic their insulin because they ate chocolate cake the night before? Would we deny the person with heart disease medications because they ate chicken wings and french fries? Of course not, because we do not think of those other chronic medical conditions as behavioral in nature. Unfortunately, there is a bias towards thinking of SUDs as behavioral, and then allowing the punishment of the behaviors that are symptomatic of the condition.

    Finally, and most importantly, we believe use of the term "behavioral health" plays a major role in the continued stigmatization of those with an SUD. Such terminology reflects a misunderstanding of SUD, and allows us to perpetuate the myth that the illness is volitional rather than based in biology. Critics of our stance tell us we are absolving people of responsibility for their actions, when in fact we are doing quite the opposite. By delineating the true nature of the illness, we can allow patients to get proper treatment for their illness. Blaming people for addiction would be like blaming people with irritable bowel syndrome for the symptoms of their disease. Acknowledging the disease of IBS allows for proper treatment, which then allows people to be more functional and self-actualized in a way that allows them to take responsibility for their recoveries and to get relief of debilitating symptoms. Similarly, when we treat SUD rationally in this way, rather than as a series of “volitional behaviors” that those afflicted should be able to stop if they were properly motivated, people affected by SUD can then take responsibility for their illness and get effective treatment.

    With regard to the stigmatization of people with SUD, researchers estimate that only one in 10 people who have an SUD actually seek help. While we know there are many reasons people do not seek help, we know that the stigma associated with SUD has a significant inhibitory impact.

    We should listen to the experts. The American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) defines addiction as follows:

    Addiction is a primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory and related circuitry. Dysfunction in these circuits leads to characteristic biological, psychological, social and spiritual manifestations. This is reflected in an individual pathologically pursuing reward and/or relief by substance use and other behaviors.

    Addiction is characterized by inability to consistently abstain, impairment in behavioral control, craving, diminished recognition of significant problems with one’s behaviors and interpersonal relationships, and a dysfunctional emotional response. Like other chronic diseases, addiction often involves cycles of relapse and remission. Without treatment or engagement in recovery activities, addiction is progressive and can result in disability or premature death.

    Michael Botticelli, the director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, has talked recently about the language we use impacting whether people seek help for an SUD and he has encouraged us to use different language. We know that some will disagree with our viewpoint and some will dispute the basis used for making it. We also know that we can only change what we do, and we can hope others will do the same.

    It is essential that we start thinking of substance use disorders and describing them by using the same language that we use when we describe other chronic medical conditions. The language is critical here: Let’s change the world by changing the way we think about, and talk about, the medical conditions formerly known as “behavioral health.”

    Robert A. Kent serves as the General Counsel for the New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services. In this role, Mr. Kent provides overall legal support, policy guidance and direction to OASAS Commissioner Arlene González-Sánchez, the Executive Office and all divisions of the agency. Robert is leading the OASAS efforts to implement Governor Cuomo’s Combat Heroin and Medicaid Redesign Team initiatives.

    Charles W. Morgan, MD, FASAM, FAAFP, DABAM is the Medical Director of OASAS. He has worked in the field of Addiction Medicine for over three decades and is a Fellow of both the American Society of Addiction Medicine and the American Academy of Family Medicine. Dr. Morgan has expertise in all modalities of patient and family healthcare.

  • 11 Nov 2015 12:50 PM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    Any peer assistance or alternative to discipline program is invited to submit an article for the Journal of Addiction Nursing. The deadline is early December. This is a great way to get the word out on different programs in existence and to also offer some direction to those who may be considering starting a program.

    If you are interested, please submit your article to Becky Eisenhut,

    The length of the article can be 1500-2000 words. Citations and references should be used where applicable. Two sample articles are attached as sample1 and sample2. There are no requirements on what to include but the following areas are usually of interest:

    • History
    • What the program looks like today
    • Challenges faced
    • Success’s celebrated
      Future plans
    • Statistics
    • A typical scenario
  • 03 Nov 2015 8:52 AM | Robert Ranieri (Administrator)

    Notice of NOAP Membership Meeting
    Thursday, November 12, 2015
    This meeting will be conducted by conference call
    3:30pm Eastern, 2:30pm Central, 1:30pm Mountain; 12:30pm Pacific

    Agenda - See below or download PDF

    We are scheduling a membership meeting via conference call to discuss the recent vote for changes in the organizations bylaws. In the spirit of transparency, we encourage all members to participate in this meeting via conference call.

    Rationale for By-Laws Change
    The Executive Committee recommends the change in the by-laws to eliminate the Vice President office at the end of the current term in March 2016 and to replace it with the President-Elect office at the same time.

    The current by-laws dictate the President and Vice President are elected in alternate years. This leaves a potential gap in progression, as the current president goes out of office and the current Vice-President cannot progress to President at that time as the VP term is not complete. Changing the by-laws to have a President-Elect instead of a Vice President would give the organization continuity in the leadership positions. The position of President is crucial and having the President-Elect have the time to spend learning what the office entails would be a great benefit for the organization.

    Caveat: for the first cycle, the President-Elect would serve one year in that role, then transition into President in 2017 for a full two-year term.

    Thursday, November 12, 2015
    3:30pm Eastern, 2:30pm Central, 1:30pm Mountain; 12:30pm Pacific

    Dial instructions:
    Phone#: 641-715-3580
    Passcode: 439469#

    2. Review of bylaw vote
      1. Rationale
      2. Open discussion
      3. Call for vote
    3. Discussion of upcoming conference
    4. Discussion and request for nominations
    7. ADJOURN


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software